中文摘要：

流动人口的管控是国家治理的重要任务,也是透视国家治理的重要窗口。人口流动给国家治理带来了重要挑战,也促进了各种治理技术的发展。从中国古代社会流动人口管控的实践来看,国家管控流动人口的基本举措主要有严格限制、申报登记和安置赈济等,这其中包含了四种治理技术,并与国家治理目标形成四种匹配模式,即不流动—捆绑技术、清晰化—测算技术、有序化—吸纳技术、无害化—控制技术。透过流动人口管控实践的历史,可以看到国家治理技术演进的内在逻辑,主要是治理技术随着社会变迁而出现存废和扬弃,治理技术的精密化越来越高,治理技术嵌入了更多福利化的内容,治理技术本身及其应用情境更趋复杂化。对流动人口管控技术的分析有助于理解国家治理技术的常态性、动态性和复杂性。

英文摘要：

The population mobility is a normal phenomenon of societies, and is the result of the economic and social development. The mobility of population provides the human resource for economic and social development, but it also causes realistic problems related to livelihood, social inclusion, crime, etc. Controlling the mobility of population is an important task of state governance, and at the same time, a window for exploring the value and the technology of state governance. Practice of mobile population management also means a vast visibility, which indicates a straightforward, broad and complex effect towards social public lives. This paper mainly focuses on the evolving logic of state governance technology through the practice of mobile population management, bases on the history of mobile population control in traditional society in China, and summarizes the basic measures--mainly including strict restriction, registration, emplacement, remedy, etc.--to control the mobile population. In the end, this essay summarizes four kinds of state governance technologies. Based on that, this essay develops four kinds of related modes according to the aims of state governance, that is,immobility-bundle technology, clarify-measurement technology, order-absorption technology and harmless-control technology. These different governance technologies together serve the aim of controlling the mobile population from different perspectives. By examining the history of the practice of controlling mobile population, we can find the inner logic of the evolution of state governance technology. It shows that, as the transformation of social value and state demands proceeds, governance technology may survive or be abandoned. Due to the sophistication and especially the digitalization of governance technologies, Governance technology tends to promote the quality of public service and welfare. The governance technologies and their applications are becoming more and more complex. In particular, they should face up to the complex economy and