以"图书情报档案学"专业的50位高产作者为统计对象,以绝对发文量、相对发文量、作者合作度、作者合作率、总被引频次、总下载频次、篇均被引频次、篇均下载频次和h指数等为计量指标,对作者的合作程度与科研产出数量及学术影响力进行了Spearman相关性分析,以验证科研合作的程度与科研产出及科研水平之间是否存在"量"与"质"的等比关系。经实际统计分析后发现,作者的合作程度与其科研产出的数量之间不存在有意义的正相关关系,但作者的合作程度与其科研产出的学术影响力之间存在显著的正相关关系。
This paper uses the 50 productive authors as statistical objects and uses the absolute amount of scientific papers,the relative amount of scientific papers,the ratio of co-authors,the level of co-authors and so on as statistical indicators to take a Spearman Correlated Analysis on the relationship between the scientific collaboration degree among authors and the output of scientific collaboration,in order to verify whether there exists a geometric relationship between them.From the outcome of actual statistical analysis,it can find that an author's level of scientific collaboration and his or her scientific output amount don't have significant positive correlation,but an author's level of scientific collaboration and his or her academic influence have significant positive correlation.