“治理”可以说是近年来被学术界运用的最混乱的术语之一了。进行政府治理绩效评估,首先需要厘清“治理”的内核,在此基础上廓清“治理域”与“政府治理域”的范围。我们发现,政府治理的特点在于价值理性的追求在于民主行政、工具理性的追求在于效率行政,同时,它是碎片化行政和审议行政。与此相对应,政府治理绩效评估的难点在于民主行政的绩效难于把握、碎片化行政的绩效信息难以有效获取、审议行政的参与度难以评估、效率性的追求与前三者之间的协调难以测度。针对这些问题,我们建议运用数据挖掘技术作为政府治理绩效评估的工具。
"Governance" is one of the terms which have been misused by the accademic circle in recent years. When one starts to study government governance performance evaluation, he must make out what is the real governance at first. We find the characteristics of government governance: the pursuit of value rationality lies in democratic administration, the pursuit of instrumental rationality lies in effective administration and at the same time it is fragment and audit administration. The Difficulty of government governance performance evaluation lies in that it is hard to control the performance of democratic administration, bard to gain the performance information of fragment administration, hard to evaluate the degree of participation of audit administration and hard to evaluate the coordination betwen the pursuit of efficiency and the former three points. According to the findings, we suggest to use Data Mining technology to overcome the difficulties of in government governance performance evaluation.