位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
弥漫型和局限型子宫腺肌病超声消融安全性对比分析
  • ISSN号:1672-8475
  • 期刊名称:《中国介入影像与治疗学》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R654.4[医药卫生—临床医学;医药卫生—外科学]
  • 作者机构:[1]重庆医科大学生物医学工程学院省部共建超声医学工程国家重点实验室超声医学工程重庆市重点实验室,重庆400016, [2]重庆医科大学附属第一医院超声消融治疗中心,重庆400042
  • 相关基金:国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题项目(2011BAI14B01); 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB707900)
中文摘要:

目的评价超声消融治疗弥漫型子宫腺肌病的安全性。方法对308例子宫腺肌病患者行高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融治疗,并于术后1天行MR检查,其中弥漫型子宫腺肌病184例(弥漫组),局限型子宫腺肌病124例(局限组)。评估并比较两组的消融治疗效果、术中及术后不良反应及并发症情况。结果对308例患者均顺利完成治疗,消融发生率为99.35%(306/308),弥漫组消融率[(25.47±13.29)%]低于局限组[(45.00±20.44)%],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。HIFU术中弥漫组较局限组发生皮肤烫的风险增加1.80倍,局限组较弥漫组发生腹股沟区痛的风险增加2.12倍;术后局限组较弥漫组发生下肢感觉异常的风险增加6.28倍。308例中,65例(65/308,21.10%)因并发症接受简单治疗[国际放射治疗协会(SIR)-B级],其中弥漫组与局限组分别为39例(39/184,21.20%)和26例(26/124,20.97%),差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组均未发生SIR-C~SIR-F级并发症。结论在严格控制消融范围的情况下,对弥漫型与局限型子宫腺肌病同样行HIFU治疗是安全、可行的。

英文摘要:

Objective To evaluate the safety of ultrasound ablation for diffuse adenomyosis.Methods A total of 308 patients with adenomyosis underwent the treatment of high-intensity focused ultrasound(HIFU).And then MR examinations were performed in the first day after operation.Among them,there were 184 cases with diffuse adenomyosis(diffuse group)and 124 cases with focal adenomyosis(focal group).The ablation results,intraoperative adverse effects and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results For all of the patients,the procedure were completed successfully.The incidence of ablation was 99.35%(306/308).The ablation ratio of diffuse group([25.47±13.29]%)was lower than that of focal group([45.00±20.44]%).There was significant difference of ablation ratio between the two groups(P0.01).The risk of intraoperative skin burn was 1.80 fold of diffuse group compared with focal group,while the risk of inguinal pain of focal group increased 2.12 fold compared with diffuse group.The risk of postoperative lower limbs paresthesia of focal group was 6.28 fold higher than that of diffuse group.There were 65 of 308cases(65/308,21.10%)accepted nominal therapy because of complications([Society of Interventional Radiology,SIR]-B grade).Among them,there were 39cases(39/184,21.20%)in diffuse group and 26cases(26/124,20.97%)in focal group,respectively.No significant difference was found between the two groups(P0.05).Neither of the complained complications of SIR-C—SIR-F grade occurred in the two groups.Conclusion HIFU is safe and feasible for both diffuse and focal adenomyosis with strict control of the ablation range.

同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《中国介入影像与治疗学》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中国科学院
  • 主办单位:中科院声学研究所
  • 主编:邹英华
  • 地址:北京市海淀区北四环西路21号大猷楼502室
  • 邮编:100190
  • 邮箱:cjiit@mail.ioa.ac.cn
  • 电话:010-82547901/2/3
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1672-8475
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:11-5213/R
  • 邮发代号:80-220
  • 获奖情况:
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 被引量:7420