位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
概率分布等值法及其应用
  • ISSN号:0439-755X
  • 期刊名称:《心理学报》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:B841[哲学宗教—基础心理学;哲学宗教—心理学]
  • 作者机构:[1]江西师范大学计算机信息工程学院,南昌330022, [2]江西师范大学鹰潭学院信息技术系,鹰潭335000
  • 相关基金:国家自然科学基金(60263005),江西省自然科学基金(0411021),省科技厅攻关项目,省教育厅科技项目,省高校人文社科研究项目(JY06201),全国教育考试科研规划项目(2006JKS3063),卫生部课题(JM20060070,KY200704)资助.
中文摘要:

在项目反应理论框架下,根据已有文献提出了开发新的测验等值准则的方法,即许多准则都可以看成是通过对锚题上作答反应概率分布进行变换而导出。据此揭示了两个著名的等值准则——Haebam方法和Stocking-Lord方法之间的联系,并且导出了一个新的等值准则——余弦等值准则。为了讨论余弦准则的行为表现,开展了一系列Monte-Carlo模拟研究。模拟结果表明,余弦准则在多级评分模型GPCM上表现比Haebara方法和Stock-ing--Lord方法都好,而对GRM和2PLM,其表现不如Haebara,但可以和Stocking-Lord方法相提并论。这一发现提醒我们等值准则的选用是否恰当,不仅与等值系数所落的范围有关,而且还与项目反应函数(IRF)有更密切的关系。

英文摘要:

This paper, divided into two parts, discusses the following two issues: (1) the methodology of developing a new test equating criterion and (2) the behavior of a new test equating method, referred to as cosine criterion. Under the item response theory (IRT) and in light of the probability distribution of an examinee's response to some item, the fast part of this paper proposes the methodology derived from the published literature on some test equating criteria. Moreover, some test equating criteria could be regarded as certain functions of probability distributions. Based on this, a series of test equating approaches, such as the Haebara item characteristic curve equating method (Hcrit), Stocking - Lord test characteristic curve equating method (SLcrit), logcontract equating method, SQRT method, and weighted Haebara method, could be clearly illustrated. Further, the relationship between Hcrit and SLcrit was identified: if the mutual compensation of the responses to the anchor items is evident, then SLcrit is suitable, and if not, then Hcrit is more appropriate. In the second part of the paper, a new test equating criterion, known as cosine criterion (COScrit) was discussed as an example of the application of this methodology of the equating criteria. The results of the Monte Carlo study show that the behavior of the new criterion is better than that of Herit and SLcrit; this is evident when the data is fit to the generalized partial credit model (GPCM) in the sense that the root mean squared deviations (RMSDs) corresponding to the three criteria are compared. Further, the RMSD to COSerit is smaller and statistically significant. When the data is fit to the 2 - parameter logistic model 2PLM, or the graded response model (GRM),COSerit is comparable to SLcrit; in fact, it is considerably better than SLcrit, provided that the equating coefficient A is not smaller than 1.2. If, however, coefficient A is smaller than 12,an inverse result is observed. Nevertheless, COScrit is

同期刊论文项目
期刊论文 45 会议论文 11
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《心理学报》
  • 北大核心期刊(2011版)
  • 主管单位:中国科学院
  • 主办单位:中国心理学会 中国科学院心理研究所
  • 主编:张侃
  • 地址:北京市朝阳区林萃路16号院
  • 邮编:100101
  • 邮箱:xuebao@psych.ac.cn
  • 电话:010-64850861
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:0439-755X
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:11-1911/B
  • 邮发代号:82-12
  • 获奖情况:
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 日本日本科学技术振兴机构数据库,中国中国人文社科核心期刊,中国中国科技核心期刊,中国北大核心期刊(2004版),中国北大核心期刊(2008版),中国北大核心期刊(2011版),中国北大核心期刊(2014版),中国国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库,中国北大核心期刊(2000版)
  • 被引量:33136