中文摘要：

通过引导农民集中居住,建设小城镇和农村新社区是实现新型城镇化的重要路径之一。因此,农民集中居住成为各地政府重要的政策工具,并逐渐成为理论研究的焦点。在归纳中国农民集中居住研究文献成果分布基础上,从基本概念出发,从农民集中居住发生机制、运行机制、过程中出现的问题、效应评价四方面对研究进展述评。从研究成果、内容和方法三个角度指出目前研究的不足。总结出后续研究的三个迫切方向是农民集中居住需求研究、政府角色定位和社区治理机制创新问题研究、农民集中居住综合效应评价研究。并提出了相应的概念性研究框架。

英文摘要：

Building small towns and new country communities is one of the significant ways of the realiza- tion of new urbanization in China by encouraging farmers to live in the form of concentration. In the eastern coastal regions, such as Tianjin and Jiangsu provinces have achieved policy objectives of urban-rural land el- ements flow, reform of household registration system, and the integration of urban and rural development by promoting the concentrated inhabitation of peasants. But the applicability and effectiveness of these mea- sures in other areas of China is still controversial. In view of this, the article has the statistical analysis on lit- eratures including the total articles, survey regions, characterizations and research content, etc. The article is to give review of the occurrence mechanism, the operating mechanism, problems and evaluation from the distribution of the literatures of concentrated inhabitation of farmers. In order to lay the foundation for the follow-up in-depth study, the article investigates and reflects the concentrated inhabitation of peasants re- search trend in the process of new type of urbanization, by analyzing its development, revealing the charac- terization and problems of study on concentrated inhabitation of peasants. The results show that： the number of literatures on concentrated inhabitation of peasants is small and the quality is low. The research contents of concentrated inhabitation of peasants focused on the perspectives of living and social process, so it ne- glected that the concentration living has the feature of quasi-public products. Lots of researches used the quantitative analysis method to discuss the cause of farmers＇ will. Lacking of psychology, sociology, and oth- er perspectives, and ignoring comparison between the regional and governance characteristics, the research- ers chosen the same variable but the conclusions are different.