位置:成果数据库 > 期刊 > 期刊详情页
两种气道内深部吸痰方法的效果观察及护理
  • ISSN号:1671-8283
  • 期刊名称:《现代临床护理》
  • 时间:0
  • 分类:R473.6[医药卫生—护理学;医药卫生—临床医学]
  • 作者机构:[1] 深圳市南山区人民医院呼吸科,广东深圳518052, [2] 中山大学附属第一医院护理部,广东广州510700, [3] 深圳市南山区人民医院科教科,广东深圳518052
  • 相关基金:2011年深圳市南山区科技局立项项目,项目编号为2011048
中文摘要:

目的探讨两种气道内深部吸痰方法的效果。方法将40例清理呼吸道无效、抗拒吸痰的患者,根据吸痰方法分为观察组21例,对照组19例。两组均用口咽通气管建立临时气道,对照组用普通枕头垫高肩部(≤10cm)后行气道内深部吸痰;观察组用吸痰枕垫高肩部15cm后行气道内深部吸痰。观察记录两组患者吸痰效果(吸痰次数、吸痰量)和气道黏膜损伤情况。结果观察组气道黏膜损伤发生率低于对照组;每日吸痰次数较对照组少;每次吸痰量较对照组多,两组比较,均P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论采用肩部抬高15cm,暂时留置吸痰管等方法行气道内深部吸痰,可提高吸痰效果和降低气道黏膜损伤的发生。

英文摘要:

Objective To explore the effects of two methods for deep endotracheal suction.Methods Forty patients who had ineffective airway clearance or lung infections or refused suction were randomly divided into observation group (n=21) and control group (n=19).Temporay airway was established by using oropharyngeal airway.Then,the control group received subglottic suction after pading the shoulder with ordinary pillow (≤10cm),while the observation group received subglottic suction after pading the shoulder with homemade pillow (=15cm).The two groups were compared in terms of sputum suction effect and mucosal injury.Results There was no incidence of mucosal injury in the observation group but three in the control group.The times of suctioning in the observation group were fewer than those of the control group and the volume for suctioning was larger as well (allP〈0.05).Conclusion Deep endotracheal suction through oropharyngeal airway,shoulder elevation for 15cm,temporary indwelling of suction tubes can achieve better suction effect without corresponding complications.

同期刊论文项目
期刊论文 47
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
  • 《现代临床护理》
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 主管单位:中华人民共和国教育部
  • 主办单位:中山大学
  • 主编:张振路
  • 地址:广州市中山二路58号中山大学附属一院
  • 邮编:510080
  • 邮箱:zzh.30@163.com
  • 电话:020-87330961
  • 国际标准刊号:ISSN:1671-8283
  • 国内统一刊号:ISSN:44-1570/R
  • 邮发代号:46-296
  • 获奖情况:
  • 2010年获“广东省优秀期刊提名奖”
  • 国内外数据库收录:
  • 中国中国科技核心期刊
  • 被引量:21215