中文摘要：

为准确、科学地测度农地整治项目实施阶段的效率，该文界定了农地整治项目实施阶段效率的内涵，剖析了其价值链，并从价值链增值的视角设置了包含项目招投标与合同签订、施工准备、施工管理、权益分配与确认、竣工验收5个准则层在内的农地整治项目实施阶段效率指标体系。依据标杆管理原理及项目特征设置了效率指标的基准标杆、实际最优标杆及理论拓展标杆，构建了基于Minkowski距离函数的农地整治项目实施阶段效率测度模型。以鄂州市鄂城区杜山高产农田建设示范项目为例，对其实施阶段的效率进行了测度，测度结果表明：达到或接近基准标杆，与实际最优标杆和理论拓展标杆的距离值分别为0．1065和0．4017。针对结果分析了项目实施阶段工作中存在的问题，并有针对性地提出了建议，可为其他农地整治项目实施阶段效率测度提供了参考依据。

英文摘要：

To accurately and scientifically measure the efficiency of agricultural land consolidation project in implementation stage, we defined the connotation of the implementation stages of the efficiency of the agricultural land consolidation project, analysis of the value chain, and from the perspective of the value-added chain, in which we set the implementation stage of the work efficiency index system of the agricultural land consolidation project which contained the five criteria layers concerning project bidding and contract signing, construction preparation, construction management, equity allocation and confirmation, completion inspection and acceptance. We set up the benchmark of 32 efficiency indicators based on the principle of benchmarking and project characteristics, set up the actual optimal benchmark and the theoretical extension benchmark, built up the measure model, which was based on the Minkowski distance function of agricultural land consolidation project in the implementation stages of efficiency. Taking Dushan in the Echeng District of Ezhou City productive farmland building demonstration projects, for example, we measured the efficiency of its implementation stage. The results showed that： （1） most of the efficiency of the implementation stages of the project at or close to the reference benchmark, had reached the laws, regulations, standards and plans reference value; （2） the comprehensive distance value was 0.1065 between project implementation stage efficiency index and the actual optimal benchmark, the efficiency level of the implementation phase of the project was relatively high but there＇s still a certain distance from the actual optimal benchmark; （3） the comprehensive distance value was 0.4017 between project implementation stage efficiency index and the theoretical extension benchmark, the efficiency level of the implementation phase of the project was severely undervalued, with the theoretical expansion benchmark having a big gap. （4） the comprehensive distance valu