社会化小农分析范式的提出,一方面是基于对中国农村研究本土化和主体性缺失的回应,另一方面则是对中国农村市场化进程所导致的农村社会变革的回应。然而由于社会化小农在伦理关怀、政治关怀以及小农形态解释上存在的缺陷,使得这一分析范式在农村治理研究中存在争议。同时,社会化小农对于农村市场化进程中消费膨胀压力的过于掩饰,导致其与农村市场化逻辑的不断脱离。而对于私人生活变迁的过多关注也导致其研究的公共性的严重不足。相对而言,消费小农发展了社会化小农分析范式的优势,并能够还原农民的真实形态,同农村市场化进程本身相契合。伴随着农民由个体消费向公共消费的延伸,消费小农也不断从私人的生活领域走向公共的治理领域,消费小农同国家之间的互动也由此产生。
The socialized farmer analysis pattern is put forward as a response to localization and subject absence of China's rural studies on one hand and a response to rural social reformation caused by China's rural marketization process on the other hand.However,the analysis pattern is contradictory in rural governance studies due to defects of the idea of socialized farmers in explaining ethical care,political care and farmer morphology.At the same time,the idea of socialized farmers conceals too much consumption expansion pressure during the rural marketization process,and as a result,the idea continuously diverges from rural marketization logic.Excessive concern about personal life changes also results in severe defects about the public character of its studies.Relatively speaking,the idea of consumption farmers develops the advantages of the socialized farmer analysis pattern,which can restore the true morphology of farmers and matches the rural marketization process itself.As the farmers extend individual consumption to public consumption,the consumption farmers also continuously walk into public governance field from private life field,and thus the interaction between the consumption farmers and the state occurs.