中文摘要：

文章以我国30个省区为例,构建城市化效率以及区域创新能力的评价指标体系来研究其时空演变过程,并运用双变量空间自相关模型分析了不同城市化效率对区域创新能力的空间差异化影响,揭示城市化效率与区域创新能力的空间耦合关系。研究表明：从时序演变上来看,中国城市化效率和区域创新能力大体上都呈现上升的趋势,结合变异系数可知,各省区城市化效率之间的差距在不断加大,而区域创新能力的差距在逐渐缩小;从空间格局上看,城市化效率整体上呈现由东部沿海地区向西部内陆递进的演变特征,区域空间格局变化差异显著,呈现差异化的区域集聚现象。区域创新能力在研究时段内表现出由空间分布均衡到区域集聚的演变特征,东西差异显著,最终表现出由东部沿海地区向西部内陆延伸的“T”字形格局;从空间耦合上看,城市化效率与区域创新能力之间存在一定程度的空间正相关,根据具体的空间关联模式,进一步将研究区域主要划分为高创新-高效率区、低创新-低效率区、低创新-高效率区三种类型。该研究从空间效应角度能够为新型城镇化建设和区域实施创新驱动战略提供一定的指导和借鉴。

英文摘要：

Taking the 30 provincial-level administrative areas is China as examples, this paper establishes the evaluation index system of urbanization efficiency and innovation capability to study the temporal and spatial evolution process, applies the bi-variate spatial autocor- relation model to analyze the spatial differentiation effect of different urbanization efficiency on regional innovation capability and reveals the spatial coupling relationship between urbanization efficiency and regional innovation capability. The study shows that： From the per- spective of the temporal evolution, the urbanization efficiency and the innovation capability generally present an upward trend. According to the coefficient of variation, the gap of the urbanization efficiency between the provinces continues to increase whereas the gap of innova- tion capability is gradually reduced; From the perspective of the spatial patterns, the overall urbanization efficiency presents the progres- sive evolution characteristics from the eastern coastal areas to the inner areas, the differences of regional spatial patterns are significant, which indicates the phenomenon of regional agglomeration. During the study period, the regional innovation capability shows the evolution characteristics from balanced distribution to regional agglomeration, there is a significant difference between the east and the west, which finally presents the ＂T＂-shaped pattern extending from the eastern coastal areas to the western inland; From the perspective of the spatial coupling, there is a certain degree of positive correlation between urbanization efficiency and innovation capability. According to the spe- cific spatial association mode, the study areas are further divided into three types： high-innovation and high-efficiency area, low-innova- tion and low-efficiency area, low-innovation and high-efficiency area. This study can provide some guidance and reference for the con- strnction of new urbanization and the implementation of regional innovation driven s