目的 比较BANACH评分和TIMI评分对急诊室非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征 (Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome, NSTE-ACS) 患者7 d和6个月内主要不良心血管事件(Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, MACE)的预测价值.方法 收集2012年3月17日-2013年8月14日在医院急诊室首诊的年龄≥18岁的NSTE-ACS患者.计算患者BANACH评分和TIMI评分(NSTE-ACS);并随访6个月,记录7 d、6个月的MACE情况,用受试者工作特征曲线比较两评分对患者短期和中期MACE预测价值的差异.结果 本研究共收集了105例NSTE-ACS患者.BANACH评分与TIMI评分相比,BANACH评分对患者7 d MACE的发生有更高的预测价值[AUC=0.948,95%CI(0.887-0.982) vs AUC=0.646,95%CI(0.547-0.737)],AUC差别为0.302,95%CI(0.004-0.599),P〈0.05;两种评分均能良好地预测患者6个月MACE的发生[AUC=0.847,95%CI(0.763-0.910) vs AUC=0.689,95%CI(0.592-0.776)],AUC差别为0.157,95%CI(-0.0847-0.399),P〉0.05.结论 BANACH评分对NSTE-ACS患者7 d MACE的预测价值高于TIMI评分.BANACH评分和TIMI评分对NSTE-ACS患者6个月内MACE的预测价值无统计学差异.
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic values of BANACH and TIMI scores for 7 -day and 6 - month major adverse cardiovascular events ( MACE) in non - ST - segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients. Methods A observational study was conducted in the Emergency Department of the Second Affili-ated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from March 17, 2012 to August 14, 2013. We compared the prognostic value of the two scores for 7 - day and 6 - month MACE by using receiver operator curves. Results One hundred and five NSTE - ACS patients were enrolled. The BANACH score had a higher prognostic value for 7 - day MACE when compared with the TI-MI score [AUC=0. 948, 95%CI(0.887 -0.982) vs AUC =0.646, 95% CI(0. 547 -0. 737) ]. The difference between the AUCs was 0. 302, 95% CI (0 . 004 - 0. 5 9 9 ) , P 〈 0. 05. No significant difference was found between the prognostic val-ues of the two scores for 6 - month MACE [ AUC =0. 847, 95% CI (0. 763 - 0. 9 1 0 ) vs AUC = 0. 6 8 9 , 95% CI (0. 592 - 0. 776) ]. The AUCs difference was 0. 157, 95% CI ( -0. 0847 - 0. 399) , P 〉0. 05. Conclusion BANACH score was su-perior to TIMI score in predicting 7 - day MACE in patients with NSTE - ACS. Both scores had comparable performance in predicting 6 - month MACE of NSTE - ACS patients.