中文摘要：

领导力及组织双元领域的研究认为,领导者的悖论认知模式和管理行为对于组织中任何一种双元形式的构建都发挥着重要的作用。然而,目前学术界对于这种复杂领导方式的具体作用效果及影响机制,尤其是对于团队创新过程中如何有针对性地处理团队整体性与个体差异性间存在的突出矛盾这一问题仍然缺乏深入的研究。基于社会认知理论、组织双元理论和动态能力理论,从团队惯例视角出发,构建双元领导行为-团队双元文化-团队创新绩效的影响过程模型,探讨领导行为的协调作用,同时以成员自我调节导向和环境动态性作为调节变量,研究在此影响过程中团队内、外部情景因素的调节作用。采用SPSS 17.0和AMOS 17.0进行多层次回归分析和组间方差分析,对来自长三角区域高新技术型企业中123个知识团队的调研数据进行实证分析。研究结果表明,（1）双元领导对团队创新绩效具有积极影响并且显著优于单一领导方式,而变革型领导和交易型领导对团队创新绩效的影响并无显著差异,但要显著优于无明显领导风格的团队,且这两种领导方式能够产生协同效应,其交互正向影响团队创新绩效;（2）双元领导主要通过团队双元文化部分中介作用直接或间接影响团队创新绩效,但其所包含的变革型和交易型领导行为对团队创新绩效的作用机理存在差异,变革型领导主要通过适应性文化的部分中介作用直接和间接影响创新绩效,交易型领导则通过一致性文化的部分中介作用直接和间接影响创新绩效;（3）自我调节导向在双元领导与团队创新绩效关系间发挥正向调节作用;（4）环境动态性在双元领导与团队创新绩效关系间发挥正向调节作用。

英文摘要：

The leadership and organizational ambidexterity literature have shown that the leaders＇ paradoxical cognition and behav- ior play an important role in the construction of organizational ambidexterity. However, the researches related to the effectiveness and influential mechanism of the complex leadership style, especially to dealing with the contradictions between team consistency and individual difference in the team innovation processes, are still limited. Therefore, this research constructed the I-P-O model of ＂ambidextrous leadership behavior- team ambidextrous culture -team innovation performance＂ from the perspective of routine practice, and discussed the coordinating role of leadership behavior based on the social cognitive theory, organizational ambidex- terity theory and dynamic capability theory. In addition, we also examined the moderating role of members＇ self regulatory focus and environmental dynamics between ambidextrous leadership and team innovation performance, to represent the effects of inter- hal and external factors of a team.In this paper, SPSS 17.0, AMOS 17.0, multiple hierarchical regression analysis and variance analysis were employed to analyze the data collected from 123 knowledge teams of new high-tech enterprises in Yangtze River Delta. The results show that ： ①Am- bidextrous leadership positively influences on team innovation performance and its positive effects significantly stronger than single leadership. Whereas there is no significant difference between the impacts of transformational leadership and transactional leader- ship on team innovation performance, but their positive effects significantly stronger than the team with no obvious leadership style. Moreover, the two kinds of leadership could create synergistic effects, their interaction positively influences on team inno- vation performance; ②Team ambidextrous culture plays a partial mediating role between ambidextrous leadership and team innovation performance, but the path mechanism of transformational lead