中文摘要：

目的通过对玉树地震与汶川地震应急管理的比较，验证汶川经验，论证我国突发事件应急管理体系的进步与缺陷，为进一步完善我国突发事件应急管理体系和提升突发事件应急管理能力提供证据。方法通过从官方网站与媒体网络收集汶川地震和玉树地震相关数据和资料，以玉树地震数据和资料为基数，汶川地震为对照．对地震灾情和应急管理进行描述性比较分析。结果玉树地震紧急救援借鉴汶川救援经验；玉树应急响应更为迅速，应急救援更为高效、科学和制度化，恢复重建更为科学有序；但应急管理的预防和预警两个阶段尚无明显改观。结论汶川经验在玉树救援中发挥了重要作用并得到验证。通过玉树与汶川地震应急管理四个阶段的比较．可以看出我国在地震应急管理的预防与预警两个阶段仍有待开展与加强，响应与恢复重建两个阶段有了很大改善和提升。但依然存在不足和缺陷。

英文摘要：

Objective In order to verify Wenchuan experience and argue the progress and defects of national emergency management system, the emergency management of Yushu earthquake was compared with that of Wenchuan earthquake. It will provide evidences for further improving the emergency management system in China. Methods The information and data of Yushu earthquake and Wenchuan earthquake were collected from the official website and media network. Based on the information and data of Yushu earthquake, it was compared with Wenchuan experience. Descriptive analysis methods were used to demonstrate the emergency management of earthquake disaster. Results With the experience gained from Wenchuan earthquake, the emergency rescue, emergency response and reconstruction, the emergency management of Yushu earthquake were more rapid, orderly and effective. However, there were no significant improvement of the prevention and early warning in the emergency management of Yushu earthquake. Conclusions Wenchuan experience played an important role in Yushu emergency rescue and it was verified in Yushu emergency response. Comparing the four phases of emergency management between Yushu earthquake and Wenchuan earthquake, we think that prevention and early warning still need to be developed and strengthened, while response and reconstruction have been greatly improved although they are still insufficient.