欢迎您！东篱公司
退出
-
申报数据库
-
立项数据库
-
成果数据库
-
项目获奖数据库
中文摘要：
最高人民法院和最高人民检察院刑事指导性案例迄今共17个。通过文本分析发现，一部分案例确有助于解决司法疑难，但也发现很多问题：政策性案例过多，释法性案例不足，部分案例选择不当；案例文本对案情介绍不充分；与案例相关的诉讼文书及主要证据亟需专门公开；发布者对文本的编辑权限亟需界定；高检案例“要旨”部分在进行事实上的刑事立法；高检选择下级法院裁判生效的案例作为指导案例，侵犯了法院的裁判权。未来案例的选择、编辑及公开，需做大量改革，以使其更好地发挥指导功能。
英文摘要：
There are 17 criminal Guidance-Cases published by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Procu-ratorate up till now.Textual analyses showed that some cases are really helpful for solving judicial problems. But it also disclosed a great number of problems as follows：there are too many policy-orientated cases;the in-terpretation of the law is inadequate;some cases are poorly chosen;case descriptions are far from sufficient;major litigation documents and evidence related to the case are yet to be made public;editing permissions ur-gently need to be defined;the“gist”section of the Guidance-Cases of Supreme Procuratorate is actually crimi-nal legislation;the Supreme Procuratorate selected sample cases decided by the court,which has violated the court’s jurisdiction.Given all these problems,reforms shall be made in case selection,editing and publication in order for them to play a better guiding function in the future.
同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
位置：