欢迎您！东篱公司
退出
-
申报数据库
-
立项数据库
-
成果数据库
-
项目获奖数据库
中文摘要：
目的：探讨＂愤怒反刍思维量表（Anger Rumination Scale,ARS）＂在中国大学生中的适用性及信度和效度检验。方法：采用方便抽样的方法,抽取434名大学生完成ARS量表的初测,抽取508名大学生完成ARS量表的正式施测,ARS量表正式施测时,同时完成作为效标的反刍思维量表（Ruminative Responses Scale,RRS）、特质愤怒量表（Trait Anger Scale,TAS）、攻击量表（Aggression Questionnaire,AQ）的测试,其中107名大学生四周后重测ARS量表。结果：ARS量表中文版的内部一致性信度为0.868,重测信度为0.679,条目-总分相关分析和因素分析结果表明中文版ARS量表与英文版保持了一致的量表结构,并有良好的效标关联效度,与各效标之间的相关系数分别为0.501,0.546,0.611。结论：ARS量表具有良好的信度与效度,可用于大学生愤怒反刍思维水平的评估。
英文摘要：
Objective： To compile the Chinese version of Anger Rumination Scale and to examine its reliability and validity. Methods： On the principle of convenience sampling, 434 college students completed the forecasting version of ARS,and 508 college students completed formal test of ARS. 508 college students also completed Ruminative Responses Scale,Trait Anger Scale, Aggression Questionnaire as criterion, 107 of them were retested with ARS after 4 weeks. Results： Internal consistency reliability of ARS was 0.868, and test-retest reliability was 0.679. Results indicated that the Chinese version of ARS maintained a consistent scale construct validity with the English version by using item-total correlation analysis and factor analysis, and ARS maintained good criterion-related validity. Correlation coefficients to criterions were0.501,0.546,0.611. Conclusion： Chinese version of ARS has good reliability and validity, and can be used for anger rumination assessment in Chinese college students.
同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
位置：