关于复原雷峰塔,学术界分为支持和反对两派,基于遗产旅游的真实性评判,可以说围绕关于雷峰塔重建问题的争论,已经使雷峰塔成为中国遗产旅游案例中贯穿“文化遗产概念+遗产重建原真性+破碎学科与多种视角看待遗产修复运动+平衡旅游发展与遗产保护”的最好学术标本。关于雷峰塔重建的探讨启示我们:遗产重建对于其原真性需要认真把握,应以有关历史档案、文献资料、历史地图、口述史料等作为复原历史文化遗产的文本依据;要区分不同学科、不同利益主体在相关案例中的不同表现和价值观,遗产保护的客体,是社会共同的文化财产。遗产保护不仅仅是少数专家的案头工作,也不仅仅是政府文物主管部门的权责,广大的民众应该参与到遗产信息的搜集、历史文化环境的维护、文化传统的传承中来,都应该分享文化遗产事业的潜在福利,从而增加个人事业和民族复兴伟业的文化自信。
On the basis of the authenticity of heritage tourism, the academic world is divided into two schools : about the recovery of Lei Feng Tower, one is the supporters, the other is the oppositional. According to the resolves of the two sides, I believe that Lei Feng Tower is China's heritage tourism case which is the best academic specimen through “cultural heritage concept + repro- duction of original true heritage + crushing discipline and multiple points view on heritage repair movement + the balance of tourist development and heritage protection”. The reconstruction of heritage should be taken serious consideration. We should distinguish different disciplines, different subjects of interests expressed in the case. We should not judge other subject orienta- tion based on our own position. At last, we discuss the original true theory, cultural heritage career and system.