中文摘要：

目的调查高中学生回答调查问卷的符合程度，探讨保障调查质量的对策。方法抽查92名高中学生，重新回答20个单选题，予以比较，进行4级评分。结果复测与原测相比，完全一致的比率为74．95％；男生与女生、城市与农村差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；20题全部符合的、符合题数≥19的、≥18的、≥17的、≥16的、≥15的比率分别为4．35％、13．04％、25．0%、39．13％、56．52％、70．65％；各题目，完全一致率较高（一致率〉80％）的7道，较低（〈70％）的6道，其余7道题介于70％～80％之间；偏离方向上，回答偏好1级、偏差1级的分别占40．35％、36．88％；偏好2级、偏差2级的分别占8．46％、9．11％；偏好≥3级、偏差≥3级的分别占1．95％、3．25％；总评分，评分1级、2级、3级、4级的分别占70．65％、16．30％、6．52％、6．52％。结论高中生的调查问卷，应逐个予以质量评价，剔除30％质量较差的。

英文摘要：

Objective To understand the quality of the answer of a questionnaire survey, so as to explore countermeasures for ensuring the quality of questionnaire survey. Methods A total of 92 students of senior high school were surveyed, retested on 20 topics and then compared with the original test. The results were divided into 4 levels. Results The ratio of completely consistent （CC） of the 20 topics was 74.95 %. There were no statistical significances between male and female （ P 〉0.05）and between urban and rural （ P 〉0.05）. The ratio of the number of subjects who replied 20 right, ≥ 19,≥18,≥17,≥16 and ≥15 topics was 4.35% ,13.04%,25.00%,39. 13% ,56. 52% and 70.65% （to compare the first and the second test;denominator was 92）. There were 7 topics whose CC was above 80 %. There were 6 topics whose CC was below 70% . There were 7 topics whose CC was 70- 80%. The ratio of the second test was better 1,2 and -3 grade than the first test was 40. 3536 and 88 % %, respectively;while the ratio of the second test was worse 1,2 and -3 grade than the first test was 8.46% and 9.11% respectively. The ratio of the scores that were judged level 1,2,3 and 4 was 70.65 % , 16.30 % , 6.52 % and 6.52 % respectively. Conclusion The questionnaires of students from senior high schools should be judged one by one, eliminating 30 % with poor quality.