欢迎您！东篱公司
退出
-
申报数据库
-
立项数据库
-
成果数据库
-
项目获奖数据库
中文摘要：
为了观察＂菌毒清＂口服液对人工感染鸡传染性鼻炎的治疗效果与现有的治疗鸡呼吸道疾病的中药＂瘟毒清＂口服液疗效进行比较。试验分为7组,包括2.0%、1.5%、1.0%和0.5%＂菌毒清＂饮水治疗组,1.0%＂瘟毒清＂饮水治疗组,阳性空白对照组和阴性空白对照组,鸡只自由饮用,连用7 d为1疗程。经1个疗程的治疗,＂菌毒清＂治疗组的治愈率分别为69.23%、77.78%、81.48%和62.96%,＂瘟毒清＂组的治愈率为78.57%;＂菌毒清＂治疗组的有效率分别为88.46%、88.80%、94.81%和81.48%,＂瘟毒清＂治疗组的有效率为89.29%;不同剂量＂菌毒清＂治疗组的有效率与＂瘟毒清＂治疗组差异不显著,但不同药物治疗组与阳性空白对照组差异显著（P〈0.05）。表明＂菌毒清＂是治疗鸡传染性鼻炎的有效药物之一。
英文摘要：
To estimate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine preparation Junduqing oral liquid for chicken respiratory disease,the chickens were artificially infected by Haemophilusgallinarum.In our study traditional Chinese medicine Wenduqing was set as the control drug.The chickens were randomly divided into 7 groups,which contained four therapeutical groups of 2.0%,1.5%,1.0%and 0.5%Junduqing in water,and three control groups of 1.0%Wenduqing in water,positive control group and negative control group.The water with drug was drunk freely in every group for seven days as a course of treatment.The results showed that the cure rates of the four therapeutical groups were 69.23%,77.78%,81.48%and 62.96%respectively,and Wenduqing control group was 78.57%.The effective rates of these 4 groups with Junduqing were 88.46%,88.80%,94.81%and 81.48%respectively,andWenduqing was 89.29%.There was no significant differences in cure rate and effective rate between 4 Junduqing therapeutical groups and Wenduqing control group.However,there had significant differences between these five groups and the positive control group（P〈0.05）.The experiment demonstrated that Junduqing was an effective traditional Chinese medicine preparation for avian infectious coryza and was better than Wenduqing in same dosage.
同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
位置：