欢迎您！东篱公司
退出
-
申报数据库
-
立项数据库
-
成果数据库
-
项目获奖数据库
中文摘要：
两年来全国政府绩效管理试点工作不乏代表性的样本，路径不同，结果迥然相异。有两种情况值得关注：一是基于“以绩效评价统筹各项考评”构建政府绩效管理体系，二是在原有考评上增加绩效评价。两种做法的理念、定位与路径不同，目标及其实现亦存在明显差异，当然，亦存在介于上述两种情况之间的折中的做法。总结各地的经验，我们以为，政府绩效管理试点工作的核心问题不仅在于调整管理权，还在于规范管理的组织权，或者说，政府绩效管理是对体制内权力关系的再分配。
英文摘要：
The national government performance management experimental units have emerged representative samples in two years, and different paths have brought about different results. There are two kinds of situations that should be paid a close attention to.. one is to construct a government performance management system in accordance with a principle of making performance evaluation coordinate all other evaluations, the two is to add performance evaluation to the origi- nal evaluations. The idea, location and path of two practices are different, so the goals of achieving exist obvious difference and then form a compromise approach. From the investigation we have found： the core problem of govern- ment performance management experimental unit is not only to adjust the management authority, but also to stand- ardize the organizational power, that is to say, government performance management is the redistribution of power relations within a system.
同期刊论文项目
同项目期刊论文
期刊信息
位置：